Over the last four days, I've watched more football than is probably healthy. Some of it has been quite entertaining and I'd say that the 4th quarter and overtime of the Vanier Cup on Friday night was the most compelling of any I saw. McMaster won their first championship ever in a thrilling double overtime win over the Laval Rouge et Or. I was impressed and a little surprised that both offenses were proficient, sophisticated and exciting to watch with passing plays which looked like pro football. I just love the overtime format used in both US College and Canadian University football. The NFL should (and I expect eventually will) adapt it.
Thursday's three NFL games produced one good one as Dallas beat Miami with a late field goal and then Michigan finally beat Ohio State on Saturday before 114,132 at the Big House to preserve a chance at getting some sort of "at-large" bid in one of the BCS bowl games. I also caught bits of Auburn/Alabama and Oregon/Oregon State before settling in for the second half of Stanford/Notre Dame. Then on Sunday, I watched the Bills almost beat the Jets. I think that Stevie Johnson just likes to make headlines - good or bad. He had a great game against Darelle Revis but was called for a ridiculous celebration, dropped an easy catch at a critical time near the end of the game and last night, every national NFL wrap-up show had a feature on him. Overall, it was an entertaining game but at 5-6, hope for the playoffs now seems lost. Carrying on with the wall to wall football, I caught a bit of Patriots/Eagles and Raiders/ Bears before tuning into the Grey Cup while keeping an eye on the Steelers game in Kansas City. I feel like I've been in the film room too long so I'm looking forward to getting back on to the field. I'm just going to take it two games at a time.
Speaking of watching TV, something Bruce Anderson said on last week's "A Tissue" panel on the National got me thinking about something Michael Moore said on CNN a few weeks ago. Anderson said that Canadians have become slightly more conservative (small "c") in the last 20 years and, when this is combined with an aging population who votes in larger percentages the older they get, the longer term prospects for the Conservatives (large "c") look pretty good. Moore was talking about the Occupy Movement and he was advocating for and egging on the 99%. The last thing he said was that he remains eternally optimistic because the 1%, eventhough they have much more than 1% of the wealth, no matter what happens, they still only have 1% of the votes.
Looking at recent voting patterns in Canada, about 75% of Canadians over the age of 65 vote in federal elections. That number plunges to 35% for the 18-30 demographic. This difference makes all of the difference in the world and there is no question that right of centre parties benefit more than others do from low voter turnouts. Their traditional base is older and they vote. Michael Moore believes that they key to electoral success lies in mobilzing more of the 99% to understand the value and importance of voting in elections. Those who win elections win the right to determine public policy and each one of us has the power to shape that public policy by voting. Moore also believes that the recent Occupy Movements have energized the very demographic whose votes are so badly needed but often not cast at all. He desperately hopes that this recent energization will carry over to the ballot box.
He was wearing a Michigan State hat so I will wish his Spartans good luck in Saturday's innagural Big Ten Championship game against Wisconsin.
Sunday, 27 November 2011
Monday, 21 November 2011
Dolphins 35, Bills 8
Last week, the US Congress declared pizza to be a vegetable. I saw this flash across a TV screen as I ordered a coffee in a downtown food court and I felt a need to dig into this story to see what was really going on because it's really a scientific question isn't it? Tomatoes are actually a fruit but, for the US Congress, the 2 ounces of tomato sauce on a typical slice of pizza constitute a "vegetable" within the meaning of the requirements of the $11 billion US School Lunch Program.
Here's what's happened: Since 1980, teenage obesity rates in the US have tripled. To help address this alarming trend, earlier this year, the Obama Administration, through the US Department of Agriculture, proposed a series of changes to the government sponsored school lunch program. The general goal was to reduce the consumption of fatty and starchy foods - like pizza and french fries - and increase the consumption of vegetables and whole grains in the program across the country. For companies wanting to win contracts to provide school lunches, the rules about what is served and what is not were going to change - for the betterment of the country's elementary and high school students. The government pays for the program and can therefore establish and improve these critera, right? Who would object to the general idea of kids eating a more healthy diet? The proposed changes, which also included a reduction in the salt content of lunch items, seemed like a sensible public policy improvement.
Well, the American Frozen Foods Institute (AFFI), which represents makers of frozen pizzas and french fries (among others) saw these changes as a threat to their industry. In fairness, I completely understand. The school lunch program is big business and their members were probably going to lose a big slice (sorry) of it. So, they decided to lobby members of Congress about it. They reportedly spent about $5 million on the lobbying effort which is a small investment when you're protecting access to an $11 billion market. The lobbying effort worked (or I wouldn't be writing about it) and there will be no change to the rules which count pizza and potatoes (this means french fries) as servings of vegetables within the program. The question about reducing salt content was delayed for further analysis.
Conservative members of Congress who opposed the changes had comments like "the government has no right to tell children what to eat" and "this is just another example of excessive buearocratic rules getting in the way". I honestly doubt that ideology was the real reason for this public policy failure. I just can't accept that there are really that many members of Congress who honestly believe that the proposed changes to the school lunch program by the USDA were an ill-advised invasion into the freedom of American children to get fat. Rather, I suggest that this failure is a direct product of the way political campaigns are financed in the US. I admit that I have not researched the political donations of the AFFI or its members but the point is that lobbying in the US goes well beyond the practice of saying "here's why we don't like this and here's how it will effect us". Special interests hold a powerful implied threat of the withdrawal of political donations and this so often drives policy decisions. The US has become a "Corporatocracy" and, while it's good for business, it's bad for the country and its citizens.
Here's what's happened: Since 1980, teenage obesity rates in the US have tripled. To help address this alarming trend, earlier this year, the Obama Administration, through the US Department of Agriculture, proposed a series of changes to the government sponsored school lunch program. The general goal was to reduce the consumption of fatty and starchy foods - like pizza and french fries - and increase the consumption of vegetables and whole grains in the program across the country. For companies wanting to win contracts to provide school lunches, the rules about what is served and what is not were going to change - for the betterment of the country's elementary and high school students. The government pays for the program and can therefore establish and improve these critera, right? Who would object to the general idea of kids eating a more healthy diet? The proposed changes, which also included a reduction in the salt content of lunch items, seemed like a sensible public policy improvement.
Well, the American Frozen Foods Institute (AFFI), which represents makers of frozen pizzas and french fries (among others) saw these changes as a threat to their industry. In fairness, I completely understand. The school lunch program is big business and their members were probably going to lose a big slice (sorry) of it. So, they decided to lobby members of Congress about it. They reportedly spent about $5 million on the lobbying effort which is a small investment when you're protecting access to an $11 billion market. The lobbying effort worked (or I wouldn't be writing about it) and there will be no change to the rules which count pizza and potatoes (this means french fries) as servings of vegetables within the program. The question about reducing salt content was delayed for further analysis.
Conservative members of Congress who opposed the changes had comments like "the government has no right to tell children what to eat" and "this is just another example of excessive buearocratic rules getting in the way". I honestly doubt that ideology was the real reason for this public policy failure. I just can't accept that there are really that many members of Congress who honestly believe that the proposed changes to the school lunch program by the USDA were an ill-advised invasion into the freedom of American children to get fat. Rather, I suggest that this failure is a direct product of the way political campaigns are financed in the US. I admit that I have not researched the political donations of the AFFI or its members but the point is that lobbying in the US goes well beyond the practice of saying "here's why we don't like this and here's how it will effect us". Special interests hold a powerful implied threat of the withdrawal of political donations and this so often drives policy decisions. The US has become a "Corporatocracy" and, while it's good for business, it's bad for the country and its citizens.
Monday, 14 November 2011
Cowboys 44, Bills 7
"We're more pretenders than contenders" said Bills coach Chan Gailey after the game. The highlight from the game? Bills receiver David Nelson caught a touchdown pass in the second quarter which made the score 21-7. That's not the highlight. After the touchdown, he jogged with the ball to the far endzone, found his girlfriend, Cowboys cheerleader Kelsi Reich, and handed her the ball. They embraced briefly, each knowing that the TV cameras were rolling. That was the highlight. The playoffs look like a pipe dream now. Injuries have taken their toll. Opposing defences have seen enough film and now seem able to stop Fitzpatrick and his quick release passing game. The defence can not stop the run or the pass. Things look bleak. But, after last night's game, they are once again tied with the Jets and one game behind the Patriots. Up next: at Miami.
I'm working on a submission for Canada Writes. It's a 500 word true story about winter, inspired by Adam Gopnik's A Winter Tale. He is also one of the judges. I am writing about an incident from a couple of winters ago where I rescued a West Highland Terrier from a hole in the ice on our lake in Muskoka. The dog almost died but she is still alive today. I originally wrote the story on my blog but I have had to cut and cut to get it down to 500 words. The first prize is $1,000 which might cover some Christmas gifts.
I have been engaged in an email discussion with my city councillor, Karen Stintz. In response to my initial rant about the mayor and my concern over her close affiliation with his administration, she correctly pointed out that, during the campaign last fall, she said that she would work with whoever was elected mayor. She was asked to be TTC Chair and was happy to serve. Fair enough, I said to her but she also commented that although the mayor is controversial at times, she feels that he is following through on his election promises. Well, I just had to swing at that pitch so I reminded her that his central campaign promise was to root out the waste and inefficiencies at City Hall and balance the budget with no tax increases or service reductions. The end of the "gravy train" was going to solve the structural deficit problem. I therefore asked her where the gravy actually is because we really need it now as the city is cutting services and deciding which assets to sell. I await her next response.
On the way to the cottage, I usually stop for groceries in Orillia. I did so this past Friday and who did I see in the produce section? Long time (28 years as he told me) Toronto city councillor, Michael Walker. I had met him 10 or 12 years ago when I was active in the tenants association in a building in hs ward. I decided to say hello. He has retired to a house on Lake Couchiching and keeps busy by advocating for improved recycling in Orillia. After about 20 minutes, I actually looked at my watch but he was still not finished lamenting the election of Rob Ford or telling me that Karen Stintz showed absolutely no interest whatsoever in transit in the time that he knew her. He looks like he still has energy to burn and Orillia will benefit from his involvement if he chooses to increase it - which I urged him to do.
One final note on US politics. As the Repblican presdential candidates continue their series of debates and the candidates seem to be self-destructing one by one (except for Newt Gingrich who may well turn out to be Romney's toughest opponent), the pundits are working full time on CNN. There are a number of Repblican and Democratic "strategists" whose opinions are now sought every day. They try to think of memorable catch phrases to support their parties and this fascinates me. One of the most effective strategists is Democrat Paul Begala who was a key member, along with James Carville, of the team which guided Bill Clinton to the White House. Last week, after the Republican debate in Michigan (where Rick Perry could not recall the third federal agency he would dismantle), Begala offered this: "When I look at the economy, I think that there's no way that the President can win the election. But when I look at the Republican field, I think that there's no way that the President can lose." Carville also had a good one a couple of years ago. In response to someone who was critical of the Clinton adminsitration, he said "Whenever I hear people complaining about America during the Clinton adminsitration, I always ask them which bothered them more - the peace or the prosperity".
I'm working on a submission for Canada Writes. It's a 500 word true story about winter, inspired by Adam Gopnik's A Winter Tale. He is also one of the judges. I am writing about an incident from a couple of winters ago where I rescued a West Highland Terrier from a hole in the ice on our lake in Muskoka. The dog almost died but she is still alive today. I originally wrote the story on my blog but I have had to cut and cut to get it down to 500 words. The first prize is $1,000 which might cover some Christmas gifts.
I have been engaged in an email discussion with my city councillor, Karen Stintz. In response to my initial rant about the mayor and my concern over her close affiliation with his administration, she correctly pointed out that, during the campaign last fall, she said that she would work with whoever was elected mayor. She was asked to be TTC Chair and was happy to serve. Fair enough, I said to her but she also commented that although the mayor is controversial at times, she feels that he is following through on his election promises. Well, I just had to swing at that pitch so I reminded her that his central campaign promise was to root out the waste and inefficiencies at City Hall and balance the budget with no tax increases or service reductions. The end of the "gravy train" was going to solve the structural deficit problem. I therefore asked her where the gravy actually is because we really need it now as the city is cutting services and deciding which assets to sell. I await her next response.
On the way to the cottage, I usually stop for groceries in Orillia. I did so this past Friday and who did I see in the produce section? Long time (28 years as he told me) Toronto city councillor, Michael Walker. I had met him 10 or 12 years ago when I was active in the tenants association in a building in hs ward. I decided to say hello. He has retired to a house on Lake Couchiching and keeps busy by advocating for improved recycling in Orillia. After about 20 minutes, I actually looked at my watch but he was still not finished lamenting the election of Rob Ford or telling me that Karen Stintz showed absolutely no interest whatsoever in transit in the time that he knew her. He looks like he still has energy to burn and Orillia will benefit from his involvement if he chooses to increase it - which I urged him to do.
One final note on US politics. As the Repblican presdential candidates continue their series of debates and the candidates seem to be self-destructing one by one (except for Newt Gingrich who may well turn out to be Romney's toughest opponent), the pundits are working full time on CNN. There are a number of Repblican and Democratic "strategists" whose opinions are now sought every day. They try to think of memorable catch phrases to support their parties and this fascinates me. One of the most effective strategists is Democrat Paul Begala who was a key member, along with James Carville, of the team which guided Bill Clinton to the White House. Last week, after the Republican debate in Michigan (where Rick Perry could not recall the third federal agency he would dismantle), Begala offered this: "When I look at the economy, I think that there's no way that the President can win the election. But when I look at the Republican field, I think that there's no way that the President can lose." Carville also had a good one a couple of years ago. In response to someone who was critical of the Clinton adminsitration, he said "Whenever I hear people complaining about America during the Clinton adminsitration, I always ask them which bothered them more - the peace or the prosperity".
Monday, 7 November 2011
Jets 27, Bills 11
I like Chan Gailey. In his post-game press conference, he personally took responsibility for the Bills poor offensive performance yesterday and downplayed the ability of the Jets defence to disguise coverages and blitz packages and to stuff their running game - especially early on. He thinks that he should have stuck more with the run in the first half until they had success. He also said that his team was just not physical enough on either side of the ball. Rian Lindell was physical. The kicker saved a touchdown on a return and injured his shoulder in the process.
The AFC East is a log jam at the top this morning after the Giants did us a huge favour by beating the Patriots in New England. The Bills, Jets and Patriots are all at 5-3 and each holds the tie-breaker over one of the others and does not hold it against the third. Kind of like rock/paper/scissors. The Bills now hit the road for three straight games, starting in Dallas next week. They have bounced back after losses both times before. But not on the road. As big as the Jets game was, it is now history and the most important game of the season, as always, becomes the next one.
I have not commented on the Greek debt crisis or the soon to be Italian debt crisis, neither of which should be confused with the US debt crisis or the Canadian debt situation or the state of any other country with a debt to GDP ratio which looks unsustainable. I haven't commented because I have not felt that I had any useful or unique insight to offer. It seems that Greek society has developed a systemic attitude which attaches little value to the idea of individual contribution for the greater good. I have read that a large percentage of Greek citizens are small business owners or are self employed and that they under-report their income to avoid paying their full share of income taxes. Various entitlement programs (like government pensions), however, are valued and heavily relied on.
Ok, I don't claim to know the origins or the history of the situation in Greece or Italy but, based on what I have seen closer to home, here's my perspective: Beginning with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, the political culture in the US began to shift toward a mistaken belief that taxation was generally a bad thing - something to be reduced, minimized, phased out. The story went that lower taxes encouraged economic activity which would then increase tax revenue in the long run. This theory is widely repeated today. Just watch the next Republican presidential debate and you'll hear it. We heard it from Mike Harris in Ontario. We hear it from the current federal government in Ottawa. We hear it from Rob Ford in Toronto. Taxes kill jobs. Taxes are bad for business. Well, sometimes business is bad for people.
We have reached the point that any proposal to introduce new taxes or increase existing ones is considered to be political suicide. The fact that the programs which our governments provide are becoming more expensive seems not to matter. We haven't seen anything yet. As the demographic rabbit (in the form of the baby boomers) moves through the snake, healthcare costs will increase exponentially. My parents, for example, are in their 70's and, like most of their peers, are keeping the pharmaceutal companies in business. But they don't pay for the drugs themselves. They are covered by something called the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB). Were it not for the ODB, they would be paying thousands every month for drugs. What will the cost of the ODB be in 10 or 20 years? How will we pay for it? If it isn't with higher taxes, then I have absolutely no idea.
Last week, Rob Ford's Executive Committee was reviewing options for the sale of city assets like Enwave and Toronto Hydro. The reason? They are trying to address the massive budget shortfall. Ford said to reporters after the session: "We can't put this on the taxpayers". Really? Why can't we? I'm willing to pay my share. As a citizen of Toronto, I was willing to pay an extra $60 to register my vehicle but Ford ran on a promise to get rid of that program "because citizens were not seeing value in it". I don't know where they were looking. Maybe we can sell High Park to a developer. Or turn Old City Hall into a boutique shopping destination. At this point, it's all Greek to me.
The AFC East is a log jam at the top this morning after the Giants did us a huge favour by beating the Patriots in New England. The Bills, Jets and Patriots are all at 5-3 and each holds the tie-breaker over one of the others and does not hold it against the third. Kind of like rock/paper/scissors. The Bills now hit the road for three straight games, starting in Dallas next week. They have bounced back after losses both times before. But not on the road. As big as the Jets game was, it is now history and the most important game of the season, as always, becomes the next one.
I have not commented on the Greek debt crisis or the soon to be Italian debt crisis, neither of which should be confused with the US debt crisis or the Canadian debt situation or the state of any other country with a debt to GDP ratio which looks unsustainable. I haven't commented because I have not felt that I had any useful or unique insight to offer. It seems that Greek society has developed a systemic attitude which attaches little value to the idea of individual contribution for the greater good. I have read that a large percentage of Greek citizens are small business owners or are self employed and that they under-report their income to avoid paying their full share of income taxes. Various entitlement programs (like government pensions), however, are valued and heavily relied on.
Ok, I don't claim to know the origins or the history of the situation in Greece or Italy but, based on what I have seen closer to home, here's my perspective: Beginning with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, the political culture in the US began to shift toward a mistaken belief that taxation was generally a bad thing - something to be reduced, minimized, phased out. The story went that lower taxes encouraged economic activity which would then increase tax revenue in the long run. This theory is widely repeated today. Just watch the next Republican presidential debate and you'll hear it. We heard it from Mike Harris in Ontario. We hear it from the current federal government in Ottawa. We hear it from Rob Ford in Toronto. Taxes kill jobs. Taxes are bad for business. Well, sometimes business is bad for people.
We have reached the point that any proposal to introduce new taxes or increase existing ones is considered to be political suicide. The fact that the programs which our governments provide are becoming more expensive seems not to matter. We haven't seen anything yet. As the demographic rabbit (in the form of the baby boomers) moves through the snake, healthcare costs will increase exponentially. My parents, for example, are in their 70's and, like most of their peers, are keeping the pharmaceutal companies in business. But they don't pay for the drugs themselves. They are covered by something called the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB). Were it not for the ODB, they would be paying thousands every month for drugs. What will the cost of the ODB be in 10 or 20 years? How will we pay for it? If it isn't with higher taxes, then I have absolutely no idea.
Last week, Rob Ford's Executive Committee was reviewing options for the sale of city assets like Enwave and Toronto Hydro. The reason? They are trying to address the massive budget shortfall. Ford said to reporters after the session: "We can't put this on the taxpayers". Really? Why can't we? I'm willing to pay my share. As a citizen of Toronto, I was willing to pay an extra $60 to register my vehicle but Ford ran on a promise to get rid of that program "because citizens were not seeing value in it". I don't know where they were looking. Maybe we can sell High Park to a developer. Or turn Old City Hall into a boutique shopping destination. At this point, it's all Greek to me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)